Philosophy Dictionary of ArgumentsHome
| |||
|
| |||
| Quotes: symbols for highlighting parts in a sentence or text. Often for identification of quotations or for distancing. For philosophical problems see also mention/use, quasi-quotation._____________Annotation: The above characterizations of concepts are neither definitions nor exhausting presentations of problems related to them. Instead, they are intended to give a short introduction to the contributions below. – Lexicon of Arguments. | |||
| Author | Concept | Summary/Quotes | Sources |
|---|---|---|---|
|
E. Tugendhat on Quotation Marks - Dictionary of Arguments
II 109 Quotation marks/TugendhatVsHeidegger: In Heidegger the quotation marks are misleadingly omitted: E.g. "What you actually mean when you use the expression "being"". Tugendhat: Then it is ambiguous whether the sense of the word or of being is meant. - This is a shift typical for Heidegger. >Quotation, >Levels, >Sense, >Reference, >Description levels. Now when Heidegger asks for the sense of being, he asks for the sense2 of a sense1 of the word. - He asks for the sense2 (which is in any case not the sense of a word) of something we mean when we speak of the being of a being - and what this something is is left open. >Being/Heidegger, >Being, >Martin Heidegger, >Words, >Word meaning, >Meaning._____________Explanation of symbols: Roman numerals indicate the source, arabic numerals indicate the page number. The corresponding books are indicated on the right hand side. ((s)…): Comment by the sender of the contribution. Translations: Dictionary of Arguments The note [Concept/Author], [Author1]Vs[Author2] or [Author]Vs[term] resp. "problem:"/"solution:", "old:"/"new:" and "thesis:" is an addition from the Dictionary of Arguments. If a German edition is specified, the page numbers refer to this edition. |
Tu I E. Tugendhat Vorlesungen zur Einführung in die Sprachanalytische Philosophie Frankfurt 1976 Tu II E. Tugendhat Philosophische Aufsätze Frankfurt 1992 |
||
> Counter arguments against Tugendhat
> Counter arguments in relation to Quotation Marks
Ed. Martin Schulz, access date 2024-04-28